mkini dotcom sdn bhd


Introduction 1 The Honourable Attorney General of Malaysia AG brought this contempt proceeding against an online news portal Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Company No 489718-U Malaysiakini as the 1st respondent and its Editor-in-Chief Gan Diong Keng Steven Gan as the 2nd respondent. MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD.


Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Ors V Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd Clj 2021 7 145 145 A B C D E F G Studocu

The issue that arises for consideration is whether the respondents are liable in contempt for.

. The High Court accepted the appellants contention that. As such Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd and its journalists had failed to prove a defence of reportage at trial 9. BHD do solemnly and sincerely declare that the financial statements set out on pages 10 to 26 are in my opinion correct and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

08L-4-06-2020 W 2 July 2020. Freedom of Expression Peguam Negara Malaysia v Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Ketua Editor Malaysiakini Civil Application No08L-4-062020W. The Page 6 of 96 Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Ors v Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd court there dealt with the defence of reportage first and after rejecting it upheld thedefence on Reynolds finding the publication to be a piece of responsible journalism see paras 160162.

Five subscribers to the webpage commented on the press release making comments about the. PEJABAT PENGARANG MALAYSIA KINI. The judgment of the High Court has since been reported in Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd v.

2 To draw the chronological. The respondents own and run the online news portal Malaysiakini Following the acquittal of Tan Sri Musa Aman the former Sabah Chief Minister on 46 corruption and money laundering allegations the respondent published an article headlined Musa Aman Acquitted After. The Federal Court recognised that there were difficulties faced by the Court in pinning down the role of publication on the internet content provider when the comments were made and posted by third parties.

On 9 June 2020 the Malaysian online news portal Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd known as Malaysiakini published a press release issued by the Chief Justice. The press release was titled CJ orders all courts to be fully operational from July 1. The Federal Court held that the Malaysian Parliament must had resolved this difficulty by.

Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Anor 2021 1 LNS 89. Malaysiakini meaning in English. PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA V MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD ANOR 2021 3 CLJ 603.

Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd which is owned by Mkini Group Sdn Bhd. Rohana Yusuf PCA Azahar Mohamed CJM Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim CJSS Mohd Zawawi Salleh Nallini Pathmanathan Vernon Ong Abdul Rahman Sebli FCJJ Civil Appeal No. Malaysiakinis written submissions and the press summaries of the majority and minority judgments of the Federal Court are made available below.

MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD. On 19 February 2021 the majority of the Malaysian Federal Court Federal Court delivered its much-anticipated judgment in Peguam Negara Malaysia v Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd and Another 2020 4 MLJ 791 in respect of the allegation of contempt of court by way of comments posted by subscribers and readers on the Malaysiakini news portal on 9 June 2020. A news release was published by the Chief Justice of the Office of the Chief Registrar on the.

The Federal Court today ordered Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd to pay a fine of RM500000 after finding the company guilty of contempt for facilitating the. MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD ANOR 2020 5 MLRA 186. Malaysia Now is an online news portal published in Malay English.

Ketua Pengiklanan dan Pemasaran Digital. Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Anor 2020 1 LNS 338. The plaintiff Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd Raub was a company involved in gold mining.

Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Ors 2017 3 MLRH 400. Mobilekini was the brand name for Malaysiakini Mobile and Tablet Apps. The 2 nd 3 rd and 4 th defendants.

Manage4me was established in June 2003 and is a 100 owned subsidiary of Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd. The respondents had posted an article online concerning the acquittal of 46 allegations of corruption and money laundering from former Sabah Chief Minister Tan Sri Musa Aman. FACTS OF THE CASE.

In any event Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd and its journalists had failed to meet the requirements necessary for reportage as there was no fair neutral and disinterested reporting without adoption of the statements as the truth 10. 13 per Harmindar Singh FCJ dissenting The appellants in the. This is done by way of online forum postings.

This is the summary for the grounds of judgment for Malaysiakinis application to set aside the contempt proceedings relates to comments made by online users due to the nature of the comments it will not be reproduced in this blog which appeared in Malaysiakinis website on the 9 June 2020. Rohana Yusuf PCA Majority. Petaling Jaya Kuala Lumpur.

8 At the trial of the action the appellants relied heavily on the unpleaded defence of reportage in their closing submissions and they succeeded. In a narrowly split decision of 3-2 by the five-member panel the majority judges held inter alia that a journalist must. Financial management of MKINI DOTCOM SDN.

The 1 st defendant Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd collectively with the 2 nd 3 rd and 4 th defendants is referred to as Mkini where applicable owns and operates the online news portal known as Malaysiakini. On 2 July 2021 the Federal Court delivered its decision on the defamation suit initiated by Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd RAGM against Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Malaysiakini and 3 of its employees. MKINI DOTCOM SDN BHD ANOR 2021 3MLJ 603.

The respondents namely Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd and the Editor of Malaysiakini operate an online news portal which allows for the publication of comments by third parties in response to online news articles.


Case Update Peguam Negara Malaysia V Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Anor 2021 2 Mlj 652 Mylegalweb


Oct 12 Hearing Of Malaysiakini S Bid To Quash Contempt Verdict


Mkini Pays Rm500 000 Fine For Contempt Of Court


Malaysiakini Fails In Review Bid To Overturn Contempt Conviction Malaysianow


Malaysiakini Ordered To Pay Rm550 000 To Gold Mining Company


Malaysiakini Fined Rm500 000 For Contempt Of Court Over Readers Comments On The Judiciary


Malaysiakini Com On Twitter Malaysiakini Needs Your Help To Raise Rm500 000 After The Federal Court Convicted Us For Contempt Of Court Over Reader S Comments You Can Contribute At Acc Name Mkini Dotcom Sdn


Malaysiakini Apps On Google Play


Malaysiakini Com On Twitter Malaysiakini Needs Your Help To Raise Rm500 000 After The Federal Court Convicted Us For Contempt Of Court Over Reader S Comments You Can Contribute At Acc Name Mkini Dotcom Sdn


Malaysiakini Com On Twitter Malaysiakini Needs Your Help To Raise Rm500 000 After The Federal Court Convicted Us For Contempt Of Court Over Reader S Comments You Can Contribute At Acc Name Mkini Dotcom Sdn


Peguam Negara Malaysia V Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Anor 2020 1 Lns 338


Malaysiakini For Android Apk Download


Peguam Negara Malaysia V Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Anor 2 International Law Iium Studocu


Fine Imposed On Mkini To Serve Public Interest


Contempt Of Court Mkini Dotcom Pays Rm500 000 Fine


Malaysiakini Mounts Constitutional Challenge Against Anti Fake News Act


Case Summary Federal Court Decision On Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd Ors V Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd 2021 Lexology


Malaysiakini Apps On Google Play


74oysxnvuwa2um

Related : mkini dotcom sdn bhd.